Review: 'Nuremberg' pits two Oscar winners as a high Nazi officer and the American psychiatrist who unlocked his mind, in a drab history lesson
The long-debated question about Adolf Hitler and his Nazi regime — were they uniquely evil in global history, or can humans anywhere create the conditions that gave rise to barbarous authoritarianism — gets a fresh conversation in “Nuremberg,” a movie that isn’t afraid of putting a thumb on the scale to get its desired answer.
Writer-director James Vanderbilt — in his first time at the helm since 2015’s “Truth” — takes viewers to 1945 and the end of World War II. Hitler has died of suicide in a Berlin bunker, and the Allied forces are gathering up the surviving Nazi high commanders. The highest-ranking official still alive is Hitler’s No. 2, Hermann Göring (Russell Crowe).
Göring and the rest are brought to the Allied prison camp in Nuremberg — where the no-nonsense camp commandant, U.S. Army Col. Burton Andrus (John Slattery), must figure out what to do with them. The key consideration is whether executing them without a trial would be as bad as what the Nazis did to millions in the war and, in particular, the concentration camps where millions were put through a systematic death machine.
The man with the unenviable task of creating an international criminal court where one never existed is Robert H. Jackson (Michael Shannon), a U.S. Supreme Court justice who has been told he’s in line to be appointed Chief Justice by President Harry S Truman. He’s told by his secretary, Elsie (Wrenn Schmidt), that taking the job may jeopardize that appointment, because of all of the hurdles that would prevent a court from happening.
While Jackson starts setting up a courthouse in Nuremberg — once the site of Hitler’s hate-mongering speeches — the Allied military decides they need a military psychiatrist to talk to the Nazi prisoners and figure out what makes them tick. That’s how Douglas Kelley, an unorthodox psychiatrist played by Rami Malek, is brought in to get to know the captured Nazis.
It takes a lot of table-setting — with characters describing various historical figures as if they swallowed a WikiPedia entry and had to regurgitate it — to get to what the movie sees as the central conflict: Having two Oscar-winning actors match each other on the screen, the blustering Crowe and the continually inquisitive Malek, does produce the expected fireworks, particularly as Crowe chews the scenery by the yard.
The prison-cell interviews do establish a rapport between the Nazi and the psychiatrist. (“The Nazi and the Psychiatrist is actually the name of Jack El-Hai’s book that’s the basis for the movie). They also show the audience the insidious way charm can paper over our revulsion to even history’s worst brutality.
There are solid performances aplenty in “Nuremberg,” particularly from Shannon, Slattery and Richard E. Grant as Jackson’s British prosecution partner. They are the ones most successful at escaping the clutches of Vanderbilt’s wooden direction and heavy-handed script, and finding something true about the pursuit of justice against the most monstrous of human beings.
——
‘Nuremberg’
★★1/2
Opens Friday, November 7, in theaters. Rated PG-13 for violent content involving the Holocaust, strong disturbing images, suicide, some language, smoking and brief drug content. Running time: 149 minutes.